Working Better Together: Resolving Collaboration & Partnership Issues |
||
BackIssue |
|
|
Can't do it alone |
Recognizing that the issue(s)
crosses the boundaries of several organizations |
Listen and document how issue
affects different organizations in different ways |
Conduct an invitation
conversation |
||
Accepting a distributed solution
|
Recognizing knowledge is
distributed |
|
Recognizing resources are
distributed |
||
Recognizing mandates/ or
authority is distributed |
||
Identifying who needs to be
involved and what they might contribute |
||
Governance becomes
distributed - no one is in control |
||
Engage potential partners and stakeholders & bring them to table | Conduct posibility conversation
& explore nature of issue & possible futures |
|
Engage in relationship building |
||
Establish ground rules necessary
for everyone to
participate - purpose, principles, people, concepts, structures &
practices |
||
Consider who to include: Who has
power to make it happen? Who can stop it? Who has relevant knowledge?
Who is impacted or at risk from decisions that might be made? |
||
Partners go public with their
commitment to work together |
||
Build & Maintain Trust |
Secure an initial basis of trust |
Reduce or eliminate entry and
exit barriers Understand the risks & rewards for each participating partner |
Do your due diligence but
understand the 'person' you'll be working with. That may mean spending
some time together. |
||
What 'hooks' can be offered?
Potential benefits identified |
||
Need to re-affirm relationships of trust | Share respective impacts of issue |
|
Meet periodically to confirm
shared goals & understandings and confirm any changed
organizational operating contexts. The more interdependent you
are, the more
frequent should be these meetings. |
||
Ongoing sharing of
organizational knowledge and insights |
||
Need to satisfy contingent
cooperation |
Establish mechanisms for
transparency & information
flow. Define progress measures of both the results of your work and how
you are together. |
|
Establish practical, achieveable
targets for each partner |
||
Create governance structure |
Prepare a distributed governance
model |
|
Collective
Learning |
Establish common knowledge base |
Preparation of state of issue
review, cases,
needs assessment or studies. Determine what information partners
require to make a decision. |
How are stakeholders
contributing to the status quo of the issue? |
||
What metaphors / frames are in
use by stakeholders? |
||
Can these frames be reconciled? |
||
Use your work together as a learning tool. Start with small things to build confidence in your mutual understanding & your relative abilities. | ||
Engage in meaning making |
Enagage in facilitated sessions,
where interpretation of study results done jointly |
|
Establish relevance and
priorities |
Establish priorities by consensus |
|
Collective
Decision Making |
Establish how collective
decisions will be made among partners |
Consensus is best, although a backup alternative should be established in case consensus is not achievable |
Establish how will collective decisions be transferred to home organizations? | ||
Addressing multiple
accountabilities |
Establish the relastionship
between
the collaborative body and participating organizations |
|
Who is accountable to whom and
how? |
||
Is decision making authority
sufficiently delegated? |
||
Identifying power imbalances |
There is no such thing as
'almost equal'. Mitigate any inequalities |
|
Collective Action |
Address free-rider tendency |
Establish champions for horizontal communication |
Establish regular feedback
mechanisms for exchanging information |
||
Establish partner commitments |
Publicize commitment |
|
Ongoing partner management |
||
Identify partner benefits/ value
added from joint work |
||
Recognize achievements |
||
Monitoring &
Evaluation |
Identify assessment and evaluation mechanisms | Prepare at minimum a report
annually and at
end of project and, if possible, using of third party evaluators |
Re-evaluate your environment and
project's relevance to it |
||
Evaluate the continued need for
collective action -- is the project still needed, can it be done by
others, should it be done by others, can we afford it, can it be spun
off? |